Category Archives: Foreign

Films to see at SFIFF this weekend

Sofia’s Last Ambulance

Courtesy of the San Francisco Film Society

Courtesy of the San Francisco Film Society

This Bulgarian film is a day-in-the-life  look at one of the few remaining functioning ambulances in Sofia. We watch the paramedic team driving through the streets, answering calls, and dealing with a variety of unexpected problems – the enormous and frequent potholes that shake the ambulance, the unreliable dispatch system, calls that abuse the system – through a series of vignettes. Much of the team’s time is spent dealing with people, often with self-inflicted problems: a mother calls them to convince her son to stop using heroin. The team handles these obstacles with a surprisingly collected calm despite their frustration from being kept from real emergencies. Patients come and go – we never even see them – and paramedics don’t get to see the cases all the way through, but there’s always someone new that needs help. Fri 5/3 3:30PM at Sundance Kabuki Continue reading

Stories about storytelling at SFIFF56

Stories_we_tell_02

“Stories We Tell”

Something_in_the_Air_02

“Something in the Air”

Three of the best films at this year’s San Francisco International Film Festival – “Something in the Air”, “Before Midnight”, and “Stories We Tell” – are as much about their direct subject matter as the nature of storytelling itself: how our own personal mythologies shape our experiences and mould or corrupt our memories.

Olivier Assayas’s autobiographical film, “Something in the Air” is as much about the student protests against the bourgeoisie in 1971 Paris as it is about how the adolescents’ viewpoint leaves them blind to their own hypocrisy: the film’s student protesters are themselves members of the bourgeoisie and their parents are the ones bankrolling their revolutionary schemes. Assayas immerses us in the excitement, the terror, and the exhilaration of the protests and organizing for political purposes, but he also views his characters from a distance. We see what the characters cannot – how misguided and idealistic they now are – because their own experiences are so conflated with their personal narrative of changing the world. “Something in the Air” is an imperfect film — it runs about 30 minutes too long and includes an esoteric and irrelevant sequence toward the end — but it is emotionally rousing, and makes you question how age changes how you remember events. Continue reading

What to expect at the 2013 San Francisco International Jazz Festival

ImageThe 56th Annual San Francisco International Film Festival (SFIFF), which runs from April 25 to May 9, mostly in Japantown at the Sundance Kabuki and New People Cinema,  is already shaping up to be a very exciting couple of weeks. The festival plays host to 151 films from 51 countries and across 31 different languages. One of the great pleasures of attending SFIFF is getting to see these films the way they were meant to be seen -on a big screen, in digital projection – as many won’t get a wide release, and those that do may play only briefly at lesser cinemas like the Embarcadero Cinema or Opera Plaza Cinemas, and sample films from all over the world all in one day. Continue reading

Top 5 Films of 2012

In a year where the biggest blockbusters account for both the best (“Skyfall, “Hunger Games”) and worst (“Cloud Atlas”) films of the year, here is my list of the best film of 2012, in which arthouse movies held their own against box office hits.

Screen Shot 2013-01-05 at 5.09.54 PM1. “Oslo, August 31st”
Joachim Trier’s masterful “Oslo August 31st” is a melancholic ode to the city of Oslo, chronicling one day in the life of recovering drug addict Anders (Anders Danielsen Lie) on his visit back to the city for a job interview. We watch him visit his old haunts and friends, wondering whether he’ll pull together the strength to keep going or decide to end his life. His former friends have become old acquaintances, a symptom of entering their thirties and not just his self-destructive behaviour, yet they converse with a compelling and realistic frankness. Trier’s camera follows Anders in long takes as he roams the city and slowly slips into old habits, places that were once home and now alien, and with Lie giving a stellar performance as a smart but damaged man in an existential crisis.

2. “The Hunger Games”hunger games
In “the Hunger Games”, Jennifer Lawrence gives the best performance of her career as Katniss Everdeen, the plucky, flawed, yet strong girl from District 12 who volunteers to take her sister’s place in The Hunger Games, a televised battle to the death. Although it’s a good dystopian tale, its real strength is its complex characters with adult emotions who don’t fit into conventional archetypes. Katniss is more than just a tomboy who can shoot arrows – her compassion is her superpower – and she is surrounded by men who rely on her without sacrificing their masculinity. There’s also a powerful story here about the nature of surveillance and performance, where Katniss and Peeta use their romance to work the system and play the game: it’s both an actively performed falling in love while they are also actually probably falling in real love.

Screen Shot 2013-01-05 at 5.12.39 PM3. “Skyfall”
With “Skyfall”, Sam Mendes has reinvented the Bond picture, and indeed the action movie, proving it can be phenomenally shot (thanks to cinematographer Roger Deakins), a compelling character study, with a villain for the ages, and a serious forum of discussion for contemporary issues. Bond’s mortality is a constant source of suspense as he deals with whether or not he and MI6 are ready for the modern world and Javier Bardem’s Silva is the best Bond villain to date, deliciously evil and driven by a more realistic personal vendetta rather than world domination. But it is still every bit a Bond picture, a celebration of all things British, including the title song by Adele, with gadgets, explosions, and chase sequences, while keeping everything character-driven. In a year of excellent genre films, from “Premium Rush” to “Haywire”, Sam Mendes’s “Skyfall” was the best and most cinematic of the lot, sure to stand the test of time.

4. “Life of Pi” Screen Shot 2013-01-05 at 5.14.01 PM
“Life of Pi” joins the ranks of “Hugo” and “Pina” as a film that uses 3D well to show the vastness of the ocean and to strengthen the visual spectacle and heightened reality where everything, from the ocean life to the night sky, is teaming with life. Pi, shipwrecked on his way to Canada, finds himself in a lifeboat with just a few supplies and a tiger named Richard Parker – a constant menace – to help him survive. Considering the film takes place almost entirely on this life boat, it’s amazingly suspenseful and touching, and the larger point it makes about what religion means to Pi is a clever one, making the seemingly spiritual journey understandable to even the staunchest atheists in the audience.

Screen Shot 2013-01-05 at 5.16.07 PM5. “What Richard Did”
Richard Karlsen (Jack Raynor) is a very handsome, charismatic high school rugby player, ready to graduate and go pro when one evening’s events may become his undoing. As the title suggests “What Richard Did” is a film about the horrible thing that Richard did and how he must deal with the atrocity he has committed – its full effects were accidental but certainly Richard is still to blame on many levels. Lenny Abramson’s film is a methodical character study where we meet Richard as a new acquaintance and then watch his layers unpeel as his insecurities and self-absorption reveal themselves. Although this wonderful Irish film hasn’t achieved a release outside the festival circuit and its homeland, it is one of the very best films of the year, and sure to find its way onto Netflix where it will get the audience it deserves.

—————————————

An edited version of this article will be published in the Stanford Daily

SFIFF: A Cinephile’s Delight

The San Francisco International Film Festival kicked off last Thursday, and the crowds haven’t waned since. The main festival headquarters in Japantown at the Sundance Kabuki Cinemas and the San Francisco Film Society Cinema are full of excited cinephiles young and old, there to take in films from all around the world the way they were meant to be seen: on the big screen, with beautiful, crisp, clean, digital projection.

Among the weekend’s most popular films were Norway’s “Oslo, August 31st” (reviewed in a previous Intermission) and Italy’s “Terraforma,” which had a series of sold-out screenings and eager, last-minute planners in the rush lines. Don’t despair if you missed them, though, as they are both scheduled for theatrical releases this year.

If you haven’t had a chance to catch a film at the fest yet, there is still plenty of time, as the festival runs until May 3. Between now and then, you can see Kenneth Branagh up close at the Castro tonight, where he will receive a directing award and screen his early film “Dead Again,” or catch Yo La Tengo doing a live score at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art for the documentary “The Love Song for R. Buckminster Fuller” on Tuesday (come early to make the Rush line). In the meantime, here is a taste of films that have already screened and will be screening at the festival in the coming week.

“Back to Stay”
This first feature by Argentinean filmmaker Milagros Mumenthaler is an astute and observant film set in Buenos Aires, following three college-age sisters coming to terms with their grandmother’s recent death. The film takes place almost entirely in the house where they live, which they inherited. It’s a film about the secrets the sisters keep, the alliances that form within a family, the comfort of sisters and the effect of the space in which they live. We discover that many parts of the house were off limits when their grandmother was alive, and we watch as the girls explore these foreign spaces in a home with which they feel less and less connected.

Mumenthaler lingers on each of the girls for takes that span minutes, letting the wonderfully nuanced performances really shine as we see the signs of insecurities, love and grief; these are especially pronounced in the few scenes when all three sisters are on camera in a single shot, allowing us to see both the private and communal moments they share together and how they trespass on each other’s privacy. At the center of the film is the eldest sister, Marina, the most down-to-earth one: shy, intelligent, compassionate and insecure about many things, including her body. We watch as she copes with her sister Sofia’s secrecy and betrayals, and as she looks on both disapprovingly and enviously as Sofia uses sex to earn attention; there is so much that is unsaid between these two. “Back to Stay” is, in a sense, a coming-of-age story as Marina gains confidence and deals with her grief, and we learn that her sisters aren’t as put-together as she may have originally believed. There isn’t much plot so much as a series of uneventful scenes in which immense amounts of information about the complexities of the characters are beautifully revealed. It’s best seen on a big screen where you can get immersed in the rhythm of the film and the spaces the characters inhabit, and it’s one of the best films at SFIFF.

Read the full review at the Stanford Daily here

SF International Film Festival: Three Picks

Oslo, August 31st

Joachim Trier’s melancholic ode to urban life and the city of Oslo, “Oslo, August 31st” is one of the very best films of the last year and a must-see. The film centers around the charming Anders (Anders Danielsen Lie), a former drug dealer and addict, who gets a one-day leave from rehab to return to the city for a job interview and to make a few personal stops. Over the course of the day in Oslo, he journeys to his favorite haunts, seeing friends of present and former days and tying up loose ends. It’s a celebration of all the things the city has to offer and how even a neighborhood can have its own memories and cast.

As a drug dealer, Anders, of course, knew everyone. Trier carefully shows us how Anders’s relationships have developed, and, in so doing, the film becomes an exploration of growing up from carefree twenty-somethings to more responsible thirty-year-olds. “Oslo, August 31st” is a dialogue-heavy film about smart people, so the conversations are interesting, real and resonant. If you’ve ever lived in and loved a city, “Oslo” will movingly touch on familiar themes, friendships and feelings.

Read full review at the Stanford Daily here (note: I did not write the pre-amble)

Review: ‘Pina 3D’

Pina Bausch was a German modern dance choreographer, famous for bringing elements of the real world onto her stage, incorporating water, dirt, rocks, city streets and cafés into her choreography. In “Pina 3D”, director Wim Wenders brings Bausch’s choreography seamlessly offstage into the real world–shooting parts of the dances on city streets, in the forest, on a tram, in an industrial park and on the beach–while still giving us glimpses of the performances on stage.

In “Pina,” Wenders works with Bausch’s dancers to bring segments of her “Café Muller,” “The Rite of Spring” and “Vollmond” vividly to the big screen. Cinematographer Hélène Louvart shoots effectively in 3D, which is all oriented behind the screen, creating the effect of watching dance occurring in a three-dimensional space. It’s as close to theatre or live dance as you can get on film. Here, you have the advantage of being able to get close to the dancers, to clearly see their facial expressions or the details of a particular move.

Wenders makes modern dance, which can easily be alienating until you get accustomed to it, accessible to the dance neophyte. Each of the three pieces are shown in relatively short segments, no more than 10 minutes each, and are interspersed both with one another and between the stage and the outside world. The advantage is that if a certain number doesn’t quite click for you, it is normally finished before you are too bored.

The disadvantage is that too often, the segments that you love are too short. For more seasoned dance appreciators, this can be frustrating throughout: Wenders may cut away from a particular angle or move of interest at an inopportune time, and you can’t see entire numbers in sequence. In a way, this is pop dance for the masses, in the same way that symphonies perform “pop” classical numbers where they play the month’s highlights instead of famous pieces in their entirety.

Nevertheless, “Pina” still brings a new dimension to the work of Pina Bausch by bringing it onto the streets and onto the beach. It gives the dance an added sense of urgency and spontaneity. It’s invigorating to see Pina Bausch’s choreography performed by the ocean, with the dancers kicking around in the water, and then to see how Bausch translated that setting and immediacy to the stage. It is equally exciting to see Bausch’s work re-imagined in the real settings that she re-created indoors.

One of the best dance numbers, which epitomizes how Bausch’s choreography is dance, theatre and life, all at once, comes from “Café Mueller.” The dance is set in a café; the stage is full of tables and chairs. A couple starts off in tableau, the woman resting her arms around her partner’s neck. A third person, a man, enters and moves the woman’s arms to rest on her partner’s waist, and lifts her up into her partner’s arms. Her partner immediately drops her, and she stands up, puts her arms around his neck and holds onto him for dear life. The third dancer comes back and the process repeats. Every time it repeats, it gets faster. The faster it gets, the more dramatic, the more urgent and the more charged it becomes. It is dance, but there is a story arc that makes it theatre and a familiarity that makes it a great reflection of life. And up close, with the camera right in the space with the actors, whether on stage or on location, it exists not as just a reflection of life but as life itself. Suddenly, Bausch’s mantra, “Dance, dance, otherwise we are lost,” makes perfect sense.

This review was originally published in The Stanford Daily here.

Italian filmmakers shine in San Francisco – New Italian Cinema Festival

Last weekend, The San Francisco Film Society’s (SFFS) New Italian Cinema Festival at the Embarcadero Centre Theater in San Francisco closed the SFFS’s impressive annual Fall Season of mini-festivals. The Fall Season included a series of film festivals – Hong Kong Cinema, French Cinema Now, Taiwan Film Days, NY/SF International Children’s Film Festival, SF International Animation Festival – each lasting a few days and showcasing new films from around the world.

The New Italian Cinema festival focused on emerging filmmakers in Italy, many of whom were present to introduce their films and participate in a Q&A afterwards. The festival began with a retrospective of Daniele Luchetti’s films: Our Life, It’s Happening Tomorrow, and Ginger and Cinnamon. Most of the other directors were first time feature directors or relatively new directors: these aren’t just recent Italian films but films by new artists in Italian cinema.

Alessandro Aronodio’s first feature, One Life, Maybe Two, is a dark coming of age story about Matteo, a directionless young adult, who crashed into a parked police car when driving on a slippery road. Two stories play out simultaneously: one in which the crash happens and another in which he stops in time. In both realities, facets of Matteo are revealed, which are true of him in both realities: he’s lost, angry, and bored. The film often references Truffaut’s The 400 Blows, the story of another, younger, troubled youth who gets dealt an unfair set of cards.

Aronodio picks up on the running and water imagery from The 400 Blows, and uses them in his picture to show at once freedom and imprisonment. There is a beautiful ending in which Matteo meets himself at a protest – in one story he is a protester and in the other the riot police – which emphasizes how lost and fragmented Matteo is. These parallel stories so often feel like a weak plot device that we focus more on how the two stories play out differently than on the characters within them. Despite the two stories, Matteo remains largely a mystery: you often feel like you’re straining to find meaning where meaning doesn’t exist. Perhaps Aronodio should have consulted Woody Allen’s Melinda and Melinda, as well, for that is a film that tells two parallel stories – one comedy and one tragedy-  and finds unexpected meaning in both from a device that never seems like gimmick.

Francesco Falaschi’s This World is For You is, on the surface, a light-hearted comedy about yet another directionless youth, Teo, who yearns to be a writer but is sidetracked by family problems, including his father’s debilitating illness, which lead to unexpected responsibilities. Look a little closer and you’ll find a lot of precious insights. On one level, there’s a story of a father and son desperately trying to communicate in a culture where they have never been on level ground, hurting each other as they fail, but somehow finding a balance. On another level, it’s the story of dealing with the realities of first love, where the object of Teo’s desire, Chiara, is a strong, independent woman, whose research on wine will ultimately lead her out of the country and put an expiration date on their relationship. It’s also the story of how the scatterbrained, ambitious Teo, who can’t figure out how to write something honest, comes at it unexpectedly, and finds a way to meet family expectations as well as those he has for himself.

This World is For You is full of humour without undermining the serious themes it deals with. Consider the scene where Teo meets Chiara. He orders cheap white wine and tries to pass it off as champagne to impress her; he discovers, instead, that she’s a wine connoisseur, and that only ignites their attraction. There are also some delightful sceneswhere Teo is fighting with writer’s block, including trying to find the perfect start to his story, and ends up copying out Tolstoy’s famous opener, “Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.” The humour is always entertaining but it also serves to underline just how young and naive Teo is by letting us laugh, gently, at his foibles. It’s easy to dismiss The World is For You as a shallow film, but beneath the light humour, there are a multitude of clever observations about families and the painful transition into adulthood.

Habemus Papam, which has been making positive waves on the festival circuit at Cannes and the Toronto International Film Festival, was the much-hyped closing night film, and the only film by a truly seasoned actor-director, Nanni Moretti. Moretti’s film is sure-footed and mature, a clever, hilarious, and surprisingly gentle satire about the choosing of a new pope. It will be getting a theatrical release in 2012.

When the new pope, Melville (Michel Piccoli), is chosen, he suffers from stage fright, starts to hyperventilate, and absolutely refuses to make his first public address and appearance. Hijinks ensue. They bring a non-religious psychoanalyst (Nanni Moretti) to talk him through it, but locate their sessions in public, with all the cardinals looking in, and forbid the psychoanalyst from asking him questions about sex, his parents, and his childhood. They hold the psychoanalyst in the Vatican until the unveiling of the new pope, and in his boredom, he starts up a volleyball tournament between the cardinals, and divides them by continent: Oceania only has three players and complains but he insists “if you’re good to your people, God will give you a bigger team next year”.

While many great laughs are to be had, the film works so well as satire because of the way it humanizes Melville and the other cardinals. We see the cardinals in their quarters, playing solitaire, putting together puzzles, and taking their medication. We see the cardinals as regular people with regular whims and cravings: they are anxious to leave the Vatican and explore Rome while they have a chance, to get delicious cappuccinos and doughnuts from the outside.

And most importantly, we see Melville, terrified about the task he is being asked to perform for the church. He runs away from the Vatican and begins walking and exploring the streets of Rome, contemplating his doubts and trying to understand his place in the world. He saw a second psychoanalyst who did not know he was the pope, and when asked his profession, Melville responded that he is an actor. We discover that his youthful ambition was to be a professional actor, but only his sister had talent, so despite his love for Chekov – we see him recite part of The Seagull with a troupe of actors – he went into the clergy.

In a suit, losing his breath after too much walking, Melville looks like just another elderly man, and that’s exactly how he feels, ill-equipped for the post of pope. Melville is so realistic, so human, that it becomes hard for us and for him to see himself as this divinely holy figure. All this discussion of acting is not in vain, for when he is finally forced to take up his post, we see him dressing in his papal costume, preparing for the biggest performance of his life. In a way, the film suggests, he has gone into the theatre after all.

The key festivals of the Fall Season may be over, but the SFFS is still screening independent and foreign film at headquarters, and gearing up for its winter programming and the annual San Francisco International Film Festival in the spring. The film scene is alive and well in San Francisco.

—-

Abridged version was published in the Stanford Daily here.

My Afternoons with Margueritte

My Afternoons with Marguerittecould have been manipulative and maudlin but it manages to mostly just be touching. It’s a simple story of a seemingly dim-witted but kind-hearted man, Germain (Gerard Depardieu) who, despite still living next door to his mother, has never felt loved by her. A chance encounter in the park while watching the pigeons with the radiant ninety-two year-old Margueritte (Giselle Casadisus) sparks the beginning of a beautiful friendship.

Margueritte is educated and patient and she reads the classics of modern literature to Germain, starting with Camus’s “The Plague”, igniting his imagination and inviting him into a world of words and stories. Much of the plot is obvious and predictable: Germain finds a surrogate mother figure in Margueritte; she helps give him confidence; and he returns the favour.

Yet the story is told with such tenderness that it doesn’t matter: when the film elicits tears, they’re earned. Consider a scene early in their friendship when Margueritte compliments Germain on his remarkable auditory memory and he responds by saying “no, no, I just remember everything I hear”. The camera lingers on Margueritte in a private moment as she recognizes that he has misunderstood, kindly chooses to ignore the comment, but does not judge or correct him. He may be her student but she treats him like an equal.

TIFF2010: Les Petits Mouchoirs (Little White Lies)

Guillaume Canet, the talented heart-throb French actor from Jeux d’Enfants and l’Affaire Farewell (TIFF 2009), is quickly distinguishing himself as a serious talent as a writer and director. In 2006, he wrote and directed the wonderful thriller, Ne Le Dis à Personne (Tell No One), which was a masterpiece of tight writing, strong emotion and suspense. At this year’s TIFF, he returns with his latest film, which he wrote and directed, Les Petits Mouchoirs (Little White Lies), which is a masterful follow-up to Ne Le Dis à Personne. In Les Petits Mouchoirs, Canet has assembled a cast of some of the who’s who’s of the very best in French cinema, including his partner, Marion Cotillard, Francois Cluzet and Gilles Lellouche (Ne Le Dis à Personne) and Anne Marivin (Le Coach, Bienvenue chez les Ch’tis).

Les Petits Mouchoirs is an ensemble piece about a group of friends spending a one-month vacation in Bordeaux at Max’s (Francois Cluzet) beach house, while their friend Ludo (Jean DuJardin) recuperates from a near-fatal drug-induced motorcycle accident in hospital. The film bears some resemblance to The Big Chill, if you replace the overwhelming nostalgia, with a darker underbelly of the “little white lies” that hold a group of friends together, and at the same time, tear them apart. Every character has a secret and this leads to a great deal of comedy and tragedy.

At the beginning, we watch as the characters experience the fun of a vacation with friends, the luxury of boating, and the laughter they share, all scored by a soundtrack of buddy movie American songs. But as the film plays on, the phoniness of their camaraderie is slowly revealed. Everyone has a secret and everyone lies to somebody else. On the surface, everyone is smiling and happy, but scratch below it, and you find a group of struggling and insecure people. Continue reading