Category Archives: Movies

Top 5 romantic comedies of the last 5 years

1) “Away We Go”
“Away We Go” picks up where most romantic comedies end: with a couple very much in love, committed, and pregnant. The couple are Burt (John Krasinski) and Verona (Maya Rudolph) and they set off on a road trip across the country to figure out where they want to live and what kinds of parents they want to be. They meet up with friends all over, each with their own, often strange and hilarious, parenting philosophies, like Maggie Gyllenhaal’s character’s distaste for strollers because “why would I want to push my baby away from me?”. With a script by Dave Eggers and Vendela Vida and directed by the great Sam Mendes, “Away We Go” is about complicated people and it’s witty, touching, and poignant and it’s also very funny and romantic.

2) “Dan In Real Life”
In “Dan in Real Life”, Steve Carrel plays Dan, a widower and parent of three lovable daughters, who unwittingly finds love in a chance encounter with a beautiful and sophisticated woman in a bookstore, Marie (Juliette Binoche). Unfortunately, she’s his brother’s girlfriend. And they’re all on a weekend family retreat together. He handles the situation like a grown-up but of course over the weekend, they fall in love. His daughters are adorable: the eldest is a newly-licensed driver preparing to leave for college, the middle one has the knack for falling in love and tying cherry stems in a knot in her mouth, and the youngest is just about the sweetest kid you could hope for without being naive. Ultimately, it’s about family, and while a touching romance ensues, it’s not about proving he’s prince charming: he’s a single dad who loves his brother and his kids and that’s perfect enough for Marie.

3) “Friends with Benefits”
“Friends with Benefits” shares its premise with “No Strings Attached” – two friends decide to have emotion-less sex but ultimately fall in love in the process – but it’s smart, funny, and sweet. It’s about two clever, career-oriented people, so emotionally damaged by their families that they can’t handle the mess of a relationship. And it updates the rom-com fairytale: what these characters want is an equal, a best friend, a partner. It’s a film very conscious of its genre – there’s even a fake romantic comedy film within a film that the characters poke fun at – but it transcends and reinvents it. Yes, there are many frank though well-concealed sex scenes and the outcome is horribly predictable but it’s the cleverness and strength of the characters that makes this film everything a modern romantic comedy should be.

4) “Definitely, Maybe”
In “Definitely, Maybe”, recently divorced Will Haynes (Ryan Reynolds) decides to tell his incredibly cute daughter, Maya, (Abigail Bresnail) the story of how he met her mother, but he tells it as a mystery. He changes all the names and tells the story of the three most important women that graced his life and it’s up to her to decipher which one is her mother. The women are played by Isla Fischer, Elizabeth Banks, and Rachel Weisz, so you know they are going to be interesting. We get why they would have fallen for each other, even though the relationships all ultimately ended. There are some very funny moments, like when Will accidentally slips in a detail about having smoked in the ‘90s and his daughter is outraged and shocked. Or when Will shows up on Weisz’s doorstep, only to be greeted by a drunken Kevin Kline, who Will assumes is her father not her boyfriend, and who gives him lessons in what it means to be a real man: apparently it involves a lot of scotch. When Will finally does figure out who he should be with, when the many layers of all of the character’s have been peeled off and revealed, it’s a well-deserved corny but realistic happy ending.

5) “Easy A”
“Easy A” is a high school romantic comedy in the tradition of John Hughes films with the biting wit and religious satire of “Saved” and the quipping of “Juno”. It’s the film that launched Emma Stone into stardom, as Olive Penderghast, the sarcastic, wise-cracking, confident, loveable outsider who accidentally finds herself in the middle of a rumour that she slept with someone – who is, in fact, imaginary – on a first date. Since they are reading “The Scarlet Letter” in class, she decides to embroider an A on her own clothing in a bout of irony that’s lost on her classmates. The premise is dubious but the execution flawless. It’s ultimately about a strong, young woman, too smart for her classmates, and whose very likable parents (Patricia Clarkson and Stanley Tucci) explain her completely.  It’s got many well-deserved laughs and a very sweet ending where she finds the boy that’s her match.

A revised version of this article was originally published in the Stanford Daily here.

Review: ‘Pina 3D’

Pina Bausch was a German modern dance choreographer, famous for bringing elements of the real world onto her stage, incorporating water, dirt, rocks, city streets and cafés into her choreography. In “Pina 3D”, director Wim Wenders brings Bausch’s choreography seamlessly offstage into the real world–shooting parts of the dances on city streets, in the forest, on a tram, in an industrial park and on the beach–while still giving us glimpses of the performances on stage.

In “Pina,” Wenders works with Bausch’s dancers to bring segments of her “Café Muller,” “The Rite of Spring” and “Vollmond” vividly to the big screen. Cinematographer Hélène Louvart shoots effectively in 3D, which is all oriented behind the screen, creating the effect of watching dance occurring in a three-dimensional space. It’s as close to theatre or live dance as you can get on film. Here, you have the advantage of being able to get close to the dancers, to clearly see their facial expressions or the details of a particular move.

Wenders makes modern dance, which can easily be alienating until you get accustomed to it, accessible to the dance neophyte. Each of the three pieces are shown in relatively short segments, no more than 10 minutes each, and are interspersed both with one another and between the stage and the outside world. The advantage is that if a certain number doesn’t quite click for you, it is normally finished before you are too bored.

The disadvantage is that too often, the segments that you love are too short. For more seasoned dance appreciators, this can be frustrating throughout: Wenders may cut away from a particular angle or move of interest at an inopportune time, and you can’t see entire numbers in sequence. In a way, this is pop dance for the masses, in the same way that symphonies perform “pop” classical numbers where they play the month’s highlights instead of famous pieces in their entirety.

Nevertheless, “Pina” still brings a new dimension to the work of Pina Bausch by bringing it onto the streets and onto the beach. It gives the dance an added sense of urgency and spontaneity. It’s invigorating to see Pina Bausch’s choreography performed by the ocean, with the dancers kicking around in the water, and then to see how Bausch translated that setting and immediacy to the stage. It is equally exciting to see Bausch’s work re-imagined in the real settings that she re-created indoors.

One of the best dance numbers, which epitomizes how Bausch’s choreography is dance, theatre and life, all at once, comes from “Café Mueller.” The dance is set in a café; the stage is full of tables and chairs. A couple starts off in tableau, the woman resting her arms around her partner’s neck. A third person, a man, enters and moves the woman’s arms to rest on her partner’s waist, and lifts her up into her partner’s arms. Her partner immediately drops her, and she stands up, puts her arms around his neck and holds onto him for dear life. The third dancer comes back and the process repeats. Every time it repeats, it gets faster. The faster it gets, the more dramatic, the more urgent and the more charged it becomes. It is dance, but there is a story arc that makes it theatre and a familiarity that makes it a great reflection of life. And up close, with the camera right in the space with the actors, whether on stage or on location, it exists not as just a reflection of life but as life itself. Suddenly, Bausch’s mantra, “Dance, dance, otherwise we are lost,” makes perfect sense.

This review was originally published in The Stanford Daily here.

Review: ‘The Iron Lady’

It was refreshing, though ultimately problematic, that Phyllida Law’s “The Iron Lady” refused to follow the straight biopic trajectory to tell the story of Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. Although remnants of her career are told in flashbacks, these have a different flavor than those we saw in Eastwood’s “J. Edgar”: they don’t all piece together in a straightforward story from start to finish. Instead, they are reminiscences of an icy woman gone mad. And therein lies the problem with the film: Law and screenwriter Abi Morgan are so busy editorializing about Thatcher’s career and life that they leave no room for the audience to make up our own minds, to consider the controversy of Thatcher’s career without being told what to think. Worse, the editorializing often comes in platitudinous remarks, like when Thatcher’s colleague tells her “if you want to change this country, you need to lead this country.”

In the present, where we first meet Margaret Thatcher (Meryl Streep in her Golden Globe-winning performance), she is mad and alone, hallucinating about her dead husband and nostalgic for her glory years as prime minister. Her extreme ambition in her political career led her to alienate everyone in her life, from her children that she never had time for to her colleagues whom she frequently berated without restraint. Of course, Streep nails her tics and affectations and gives us a glimpse at the three-dimensional character that the film dances around but never fully explores.

Read the rest at the Stanford Daily.

Italian filmmakers shine in San Francisco – New Italian Cinema Festival

Last weekend, The San Francisco Film Society’s (SFFS) New Italian Cinema Festival at the Embarcadero Centre Theater in San Francisco closed the SFFS’s impressive annual Fall Season of mini-festivals. The Fall Season included a series of film festivals – Hong Kong Cinema, French Cinema Now, Taiwan Film Days, NY/SF International Children’s Film Festival, SF International Animation Festival – each lasting a few days and showcasing new films from around the world.

The New Italian Cinema festival focused on emerging filmmakers in Italy, many of whom were present to introduce their films and participate in a Q&A afterwards. The festival began with a retrospective of Daniele Luchetti’s films: Our Life, It’s Happening Tomorrow, and Ginger and Cinnamon. Most of the other directors were first time feature directors or relatively new directors: these aren’t just recent Italian films but films by new artists in Italian cinema.

Alessandro Aronodio’s first feature, One Life, Maybe Two, is a dark coming of age story about Matteo, a directionless young adult, who crashed into a parked police car when driving on a slippery road. Two stories play out simultaneously: one in which the crash happens and another in which he stops in time. In both realities, facets of Matteo are revealed, which are true of him in both realities: he’s lost, angry, and bored. The film often references Truffaut’s The 400 Blows, the story of another, younger, troubled youth who gets dealt an unfair set of cards.

Aronodio picks up on the running and water imagery from The 400 Blows, and uses them in his picture to show at once freedom and imprisonment. There is a beautiful ending in which Matteo meets himself at a protest – in one story he is a protester and in the other the riot police – which emphasizes how lost and fragmented Matteo is. These parallel stories so often feel like a weak plot device that we focus more on how the two stories play out differently than on the characters within them. Despite the two stories, Matteo remains largely a mystery: you often feel like you’re straining to find meaning where meaning doesn’t exist. Perhaps Aronodio should have consulted Woody Allen’s Melinda and Melinda, as well, for that is a film that tells two parallel stories – one comedy and one tragedy-  and finds unexpected meaning in both from a device that never seems like gimmick.

Francesco Falaschi’s This World is For You is, on the surface, a light-hearted comedy about yet another directionless youth, Teo, who yearns to be a writer but is sidetracked by family problems, including his father’s debilitating illness, which lead to unexpected responsibilities. Look a little closer and you’ll find a lot of precious insights. On one level, there’s a story of a father and son desperately trying to communicate in a culture where they have never been on level ground, hurting each other as they fail, but somehow finding a balance. On another level, it’s the story of dealing with the realities of first love, where the object of Teo’s desire, Chiara, is a strong, independent woman, whose research on wine will ultimately lead her out of the country and put an expiration date on their relationship. It’s also the story of how the scatterbrained, ambitious Teo, who can’t figure out how to write something honest, comes at it unexpectedly, and finds a way to meet family expectations as well as those he has for himself.

This World is For You is full of humour without undermining the serious themes it deals with. Consider the scene where Teo meets Chiara. He orders cheap white wine and tries to pass it off as champagne to impress her; he discovers, instead, that she’s a wine connoisseur, and that only ignites their attraction. There are also some delightful sceneswhere Teo is fighting with writer’s block, including trying to find the perfect start to his story, and ends up copying out Tolstoy’s famous opener, “Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.” The humour is always entertaining but it also serves to underline just how young and naive Teo is by letting us laugh, gently, at his foibles. It’s easy to dismiss The World is For You as a shallow film, but beneath the light humour, there are a multitude of clever observations about families and the painful transition into adulthood.

Habemus Papam, which has been making positive waves on the festival circuit at Cannes and the Toronto International Film Festival, was the much-hyped closing night film, and the only film by a truly seasoned actor-director, Nanni Moretti. Moretti’s film is sure-footed and mature, a clever, hilarious, and surprisingly gentle satire about the choosing of a new pope. It will be getting a theatrical release in 2012.

When the new pope, Melville (Michel Piccoli), is chosen, he suffers from stage fright, starts to hyperventilate, and absolutely refuses to make his first public address and appearance. Hijinks ensue. They bring a non-religious psychoanalyst (Nanni Moretti) to talk him through it, but locate their sessions in public, with all the cardinals looking in, and forbid the psychoanalyst from asking him questions about sex, his parents, and his childhood. They hold the psychoanalyst in the Vatican until the unveiling of the new pope, and in his boredom, he starts up a volleyball tournament between the cardinals, and divides them by continent: Oceania only has three players and complains but he insists “if you’re good to your people, God will give you a bigger team next year”.

While many great laughs are to be had, the film works so well as satire because of the way it humanizes Melville and the other cardinals. We see the cardinals in their quarters, playing solitaire, putting together puzzles, and taking their medication. We see the cardinals as regular people with regular whims and cravings: they are anxious to leave the Vatican and explore Rome while they have a chance, to get delicious cappuccinos and doughnuts from the outside.

And most importantly, we see Melville, terrified about the task he is being asked to perform for the church. He runs away from the Vatican and begins walking and exploring the streets of Rome, contemplating his doubts and trying to understand his place in the world. He saw a second psychoanalyst who did not know he was the pope, and when asked his profession, Melville responded that he is an actor. We discover that his youthful ambition was to be a professional actor, but only his sister had talent, so despite his love for Chekov – we see him recite part of The Seagull with a troupe of actors – he went into the clergy.

In a suit, losing his breath after too much walking, Melville looks like just another elderly man, and that’s exactly how he feels, ill-equipped for the post of pope. Melville is so realistic, so human, that it becomes hard for us and for him to see himself as this divinely holy figure. All this discussion of acting is not in vain, for when he is finally forced to take up his post, we see him dressing in his papal costume, preparing for the biggest performance of his life. In a way, the film suggests, he has gone into the theatre after all.

The key festivals of the Fall Season may be over, but the SFFS is still screening independent and foreign film at headquarters, and gearing up for its winter programming and the annual San Francisco International Film Festival in the spring. The film scene is alive and well in San Francisco.

—-

Abridged version was published in the Stanford Daily here.

My Afternoons with Margueritte

My Afternoons with Marguerittecould have been manipulative and maudlin but it manages to mostly just be touching. It’s a simple story of a seemingly dim-witted but kind-hearted man, Germain (Gerard Depardieu) who, despite still living next door to his mother, has never felt loved by her. A chance encounter in the park while watching the pigeons with the radiant ninety-two year-old Margueritte (Giselle Casadisus) sparks the beginning of a beautiful friendship.

Margueritte is educated and patient and she reads the classics of modern literature to Germain, starting with Camus’s “The Plague”, igniting his imagination and inviting him into a world of words and stories. Much of the plot is obvious and predictable: Germain finds a surrogate mother figure in Margueritte; she helps give him confidence; and he returns the favour.

Yet the story is told with such tenderness that it doesn’t matter: when the film elicits tears, they’re earned. Consider a scene early in their friendship when Margueritte compliments Germain on his remarkable auditory memory and he responds by saying “no, no, I just remember everything I hear”. The camera lingers on Margueritte in a private moment as she recognizes that he has misunderstood, kindly chooses to ignore the comment, but does not judge or correct him. He may be her student but she treats him like an equal.

Review: “Urbanized”, Gary Hustwit’s new documentary

We are a society becoming increasingly urbanized. Fifty percent of us already live in cities, and 75 percent of us will by 2050. Cities face significant challenges: sustainable urban mobility, maintaining green spaces while allowing development, recovering from natural disasters, ensuring good infrastructure and many more. Gary Hustwit’s film “Urbanized” touches on many of these topics to give a broad portrait of cities today by introducing us to some exciting projects happening around the world.

Read the rest at the Stanford Daily

Stanford Theatre: One-way ticket to Hollywood’s golden age

Read my article from the Stanford Daily.

Away We Go


Away We Go is Sam Mendes’s only uplifting film and what a wonderful film it is. Two minutes in, it has me smiling, and my enjoyment never wanes, though my smile may turn to tears, as befits the emotional content of the scenes. Away We Go is a rare film that is neither about the exciting beginnings of a relationship or the sadness of a failing old relationship. Instead, it’s about a young, sweet, thirty-something couple who have been together since college, and decide to have a baby.

They are Burt (John Krasinski) and Verona (Maya Rudolph). They aren’t married despite Burt’s enthusiasm for marriage: Verona doesn’t believe in it having lost her parents at twenty-two and unable to fathom a wedding without them. But she does promise never to leave him. Maya suspects that they are “fuck-ups” who didn’t finish college and live in a home with a crappy space heater and a cardboard window. He is an insurance salesman who assumes a laughably deep voice on the phone and she draws human insides for a living.They are smart and likable though they certainly aren’t hyper-intellectuals: they are witty but accessible. Continue reading

The Social Network


There are so many skillful aspects of The Social Network that are utterly wasted on this poorly directed misogynistic piece of “history”. The film opens on a feat of good writing, perhaps the only truly well-scripted and directed scene in the film: Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg (played by the excellent Jesse Eisenberg) is out on a date with his girlfriend and they are engaged in an exciting match of verbal sparring. Their conversation is fast-paced and tangential and keeping up with it is a fun game. Here Aaron Sorkin is amazing: he captures the syntax and diction of smart people the way David Auburn did so masterfully in Proof. And even director David Fincher manages to give this stationary scene a real feeling of immediacy and momentum.

Unfortunately, what is behind this scene is the revelation that Zuckerberg is a real conceited and condescending asshole that Fincher decides to misguidedly idolise because his existing celebrity status somehow merits lionization even before he achieved his great success: the facebook. The film glorifies the entitled Harvard cohort, and treats the audience as though we all just wish we were Harvard students. Continue reading

Cairo Time

Cairo Time is without doubt one of the best films of 2009, directed by Canadian director Ruba Nadda, who previously brought us the lovely film, Sabah, but has proven herself a truly sophisticated and talented filmmaker with Cairo Time. Cairo Time, like its title suggests, is about how time moves differently in foreign and exotic places. Sometimes the personal ties that form our identity seem fragile or foreign when we visit exotic lands where possibilities sometimes seem endless.

Cairo Time is about Juliette, played by the always lovely Patricia Clarkson, the editor of a national Canadian magazine, who visits Cairo to see her husband, an employee of the UN, who spends most of the film stuck in Gaza at a refugee camp. Juliette waits for her husband in Cairo. She is sometimes alone and sometimes with her husband’s friend, and former colleague, Tariq, a local to Cairo. Juliette is accustomed to independence. She finds herself out of her element in Cairo, where she can’t walk down a street by herself without drawing the unwanted attention of a large following of men.

Tariq helps show Juliette around and the two of them form a touching bond. Tariq is incredibly handsome and exotic, polite, restrained, and intensely charismatic. He is well educated and worldly and very kind to Juliette. Yet it is never clear whether he, like many of the local men, harbours misogynistic tendencies. He owns a local men’s only cafe, but he welcomes Juliette into it. When he shows Juliette around he physically guides her, sometimes with his hand on the small of her back. He is polite, never failing to open the door for Juliette or help her to her seat. He does not see it as a kindness, he sees this politeness as a duty. Sometimes his take on the social problems in Cairo offends our North American sensibilities, but is this our lack of understanding or his? Continue reading