Category Archives: Music

Review: Chris Potter Quartet at Yoshi’s Oakland

Chris4Csubt

The great jazz saxophonist Chris Potter brought his newest project as a bandleader, the Chris Potter Quartet, to Yoshi’s Oakland last Sunday for a fantastic show. Since his career began twenty years ago, Potter has distinguished himself as one of the very best and most virtuosic saxophonists on the scene, equally comfortable as a sideman for bassist Dave Holland in his progressive Dave Holland Quintet as with the more traditional pianist McCoy Tyner at Herbst Theatre in 2011. He’s amassed an impressive resume as a sideman with much of the who’s who of jazz today, including recently with the new Axis Quartet with Joshua Redman. Continue reading

Weekend Jazz: James Farm, Mulgrew Miller & Kenny Barron, and Hugh Laurie

The Memorial Day long weekend was an amazing one for jazz fans on both sides of the Bay, featuring musicians young and old from a variety of styles. I started off the weekend with a trip to Yoshi’s Oakland on Friday, a venue with consistently high-quality international acts on a student budget, making it well worth the trip across the Bay.

This weekend, Yoshi’s Oakland hosted the internationally acclaimed saxophonist Joshua Redman, who is also a local North Berkeley resident, with his collaborative acoustic jazz project James Farm: bassist Matt Penman, pianist Aaron Parks and drummer Eric Harland. The group plays all original music from what Redman calls their “greatest and only album,” also titled “James Farm,” with compositions by everyone in the band. And it’s all very contemporary and hip.

Playing to a sold-out house, James Farm performed a fantastic opening set. Though it was clear from the start that Redman, switching between soprano and alto sax, is the standout star of the group, by the third or fourth number the group was starting to really come together with four intricate parts forming one cohesive unit. On Park’s “Kronos,” the piece started off with just the drums and piano playing together; Harland’s rhythm was simple enough but placed interestingly on unexpected off-beats, giving it a lot of flavor. The group then worked to slowly build up the different parts, adding each one at a time – something that the Dave Holland Quintet is also genius at – which lets the audience follow each layer and how they are all playing off one another. It was a good change, and a permanent one, from the blurriness of the earlier pieces, which lacked the clarity of the second half of the set.

Review: Hiromi Trio Project

The Hiromi Trio Project were on fire at Yoshi’s Oakland last Thursday at 8 p.m., their first show of the weekend. Though the performance was a few parts fusion, there was solid classical jazz alongside it. The 90-minute set was largely a showcase of pieces from the group’s latest album, “Voice,” recorded with Anthony Jackson on bass guitar and Simon Phillips on drums joining Hiromi on piano. The group started the set with the original composition “Delusion” and within seconds they were in full gear as they had done all their warming up backstage prior to the set. It was a triumphant concert all the way through.

Hiromi stuck almost exclusively to the Yamaha grand, with only the occasional diversion to the keyboards, hitting a zenith in “Now or Never” as she played a call-and-response sequence between the keyboards on the left hand and the piano on the right. As much as I tend to hate keyboards finding their way into jazz, Hiromi’s deft handling of the board really added to the performance, giving her two different sounds to work with. At one point, she walked the four key chords of the piece on the piano to set up for an improvisational response on the keyboards.

Read the full review at the Stanford Daily 

Dave Holland Overtone Quartet jazzes up SF

It goes without saying that when a concert involves bassist Dave Holland and saxophonist Chris Potter—in collaboration—it’s going to be good. Holland’s rhapsodic syncopated bass lines and Potter’s counterpoint cerebral, dissonant, rich sax are at their best live and always sound amazing, no matter who the two are playing with.

They’ve both played with their fair share of masters: Holland with Miles Davis and Potter recently with Herbie Hancock and McCoy Tyner. These two are born performers, completely brilliant and enthralling on stage; despite owning all of their albums, I rarely listen to them at home but never miss their concerts. Yet what makes these two real performers is not just their inventiveness but also their knack for togetherness.

Holland and Potter have been playing together in the Dave Holland Quintet for years, and it shows; they are remarkably in sync. Holland knows how to lead a band to collaborate, to build off one another, to keep adding layers of rhythm and harmony step by step. I’ve seen Potter do the same when he leads his Underground band. While most jazz groups play next to one another—alternating turns in solos and melodies—Holland and Potter are all about playing together, with and against each other and other players.

In short, these two are masters. It’s because of these incredibly high standards that last Friday’s sold-out Dave Holland Overtone Quartet concert at the Palace of the Fine Arts was a disappointment. It was still a great night of jazz, but it was missing their trademark cohesiveness.

The group played all original pieces by each of the band members. They started out with Potter’s “The Outsiders,” which established the basic form and rules of the group. The modus operandi was for the two to build on one another by synchronizing completely in a melodic or rhythmic element, then diverging to eventually create four separate parts—interdependent melodically—but each moving and developing independently.

The result was four layers of sound. As the saxophonist, Potter’s layer had the greatest clarity; Holland’s was equally lucid when audible, but the poor acoustics of the hall tended to drown out much of his work. Though he is a talented pianist, Jason Moran’s playing sounded muddy in the quarter; he was best showcased in his own compositions, like “Gummy Moon,” which emphasizes what the piano can offer. Eric Harland, on drums, sidestepped the normal errors of the percussion section: he didn’t bang but worked meticulously to play with pitch, volume, silences and rhythm. Unfortunately, his commitment to complex rhythms more often than not resulted in chaotic rhythms.

Things picked up with opportunities to showcase Holland and Potter in extended solos in Holland’s “Walkin’ the Walk” and Eric Harland’s “Treachery.” Harland’s “Patterns” was an exercise in repetition: while Potter looped through the same few bars, each of the others slowly built up additional layers of sound with their own internal repetitive logic. It could have been stagnant but it was dynamic, with a real sense of forward motion.

Harland is no Nate Smith, the drummer in both the Dave Holland Quintet—another group of Holland’s—and Chris Potter’s Underground. Smith has proven himself to be the Jack DeJohnette of our generation: he builds harmonies and uses others’ rhythms to develop a scintillating base rhythm, which all other parts play off of and complement. His drumming has been the glue that holds these two groups together because it adds to advancements in rhythmic complexities and points us in the direction that the music is developing. Harland doesn’t take advantage of silences enough to do this, which means that while he can play off one or two of the parts successfully—and he did so beautifully in Holland’s “Veil of Tears”—his playing doesn’t tie everyone together in a singular, cohesive unit.

What we have, at best, are two players who completely integrate and mesh; we can even have two sets of two. But never did the four consistently develop each other’s work. Don’t get me wrong—this still leads to some great music. It just highlights the inherent dissonance in the kind of music they play, and it doesn’t showcase what these performers and bandleaders can galvanize on stage.

The two-hour, intermission-free concert of the Dave Holland Overtone Quartet was met with a warm and well-deserved standing ovation. These are still some of the best musicians in the world. But when you hold them to their own high standards, they could have done better. The space certainly didn’t help; dampened sound, an over-large stage and a very wide auditorium all created awkward distance between the audience and performers, which made it more difficult to engage. Nevertheless, the SF Jazz Festival Spring Season is starting off with a bang, and there’s much more great music to come, from the Brad Mehldau Trio to Gonzalo Rubalcalba.

This review was originally published in a revised form in the Stanford Daily here.

Stanley Clarke Band delivers jazzy performance (Stanford Daily)

Stanley Clarke Band recently swung through San Francisco, playing a fantastic show with a familiar repertoire re-imagined. From the album “Return to Forever,” the song “No Mystery” was recreated for an acoustic ensemble, full of energy and spunk but with no signs of fusion, and with space made for the violin to play a key part in sharing the melody with the piano. The Band transforms pieces from Clarke’s relaxed, cool jazz trio album “Jazz in the Garden,” such as “Paradigm Shift,” “Sakura Sakura” and “Three Wrong Notes,” into something closer to bebop. They’ve got the energetic rock sensibilities, but thankfully and gratifyingly, they stuck to their jazz and fusion- free roots.

There is no other jazz bassist quite like Stanley Clarke. Though his mainstream fame comes from his rock-star fusion electric bass playing from “Return to Forever,” it’s his upright bass work where he’s a true visionary. He has the uncanny ability to play the bass like a cellist, equally comfortable leading the melody or backing it up with bass lines that do so much more than walk the chords. He can also transform his bass into a percussion instrument in what are always crowd-pleasing turns, slapping it up and down like a drum, making use of the differences in pitch depending on where he hits the neck and fingerboard.

Although missing frequent guest pianist Hiromi, the Stanley Clarke Band was in top form with its current lineup. Ruslan Sirota’s move from electric keyboards to a Steinway grand has led him to find a new lucidity, allowing for crisper, more articulated sounds, so neces-sary in allowing him to build com-plex parts in both hands and have them heard by the audience. Violinist Zach Brock has great chemistry with Clarke; the two are able to play off and accentuate each other’s work, making these two stringed instruments anything but stiff. Ronald Bruner, Jr. on drums is also a notch above your average drummer, taking the time to build rhythms in his solos, using the base rhythms of the piece and only sometimes resorting to haphazard loud banging, the usual pitfall of the drum solo. At times, Bruner’s solos turned into a marvelous rhythmic call-and-response with himself.

This was a concert without lows: It started off well and, by the end, reached even greater heights. Stanley Clarke Band can seamlessly piece together a melody on multiple instruments: one phrase on the piano, the next on violin and the next on bass, sometimes with a couple of instruments leading the melody in tandem. In the first piece, “No Mystery,” I was so satis-fied by the Stanley Clarke Band’s playing and their solos that by the time we hit Clarke’s solos, it was a shock that things were certain to get better. There’s an unmatched fullness of sound and complexity to Clarke’s playing, created by carefully chosen rhythms, punctuated with silence and rests which help create focal points and enhance the melodic riffs. In his “No Mystery” solo, Clarke explored the melody and found similarities to other pieces, quoting from funk to pop and ending with a few bars of “My Girl,” which Bruner even added to with a bit of vocals.

The Stanley Clarke Band is solid; Clarke’s solos never fail to be the zenith of any piece. But what makes the band great, more than just adequate backup for the great Clarke, is the way they play off each other. They improvise together, they collaborate on melodies and rhythms across instruments, they have synergistic energy and they do it all so smoothly that you might mistake the bass for drums or the violin for the upper register of the bass. They work hard to make the most of what each instrument has to offer to enhance a piece: it’s democratic and nothing short of awe-inspiring.

This article was originally published at the Stanford Daily and can be viewed here on page 7-8: 81171917-DAILY-02-10-12.

Solid ‘Story’ in San Jose: Review of West Side Story

When “West Side Story” opens, we are introduced to two New York street gangs: the Sharks and the Jets. And they’re dancing with fisticuffs. It takes a few minutes to get used to the fact that the stage-fights will be dance-fights, but once you do, you know you’re in for a ride. The cast of this Broadway revival tour in San Jose can definitely dance. This is a show with a story told largely through song and dance; it’s physical and visceral and, for the most part, it’s done pretty darn well.

“West Side Story” is the epitome of what a good musical should be. It’s full of memorable songs, impressive dance numbers, and a poignant story to tie it all together. Leonard Bernstein composed the complex and enduring music with lyrics by Steven Sondheim, choreography reproduced from Jerome Robbins’s original work for the play and a story based on Shakespeare’s “Romeo and Juliet.”

It’s the Upper West Side in the 1950s, and our Romeo is Tony, an American and the former leader of the Jets. His Juliet is Maria, a Puerto Rican immigrant whose family belongs to the opposing street gang, the Sharks. The gangs hate each other based on principle and unshakeable racism. But when Tony (Ross Lekites) and Maria (Evy Ortiz) meet at the local dance, it’s inauspicious, colour-blind love at first sight.

The story is told largely through song and dance. Bernstein’s music is a great challenge to sing: it requires a huge vocal range and the ability to master difficult syncopated rhythms and melodies with challenging intervals. Ross Lekites, as Tony, owns his musical part. He has a powerhouse voice with large and beautiful range that never becomes operatic. Every note is clear, with perfect pitch, allowing the music to shine to its fullest. Ortiz’s voice is meeker, by comparison, but full enough to get the message across. The rest of the cast does a fine job tackling this complex but rewarding material. Unlike many modern musicals, you will leave “West Side Story” humming the songs.

This production is wonderfully choreographed and staged, making excellent use of space and of James Youmans’ wonderful set design, which places you right in the streets of New York. The love scenes between Tony and Maria always take place on an island set-piece–her balcony, her bed or an empty stage without a background–because, as they lament in the song “Somewhere,” their relationship doesn’t belong in the world they live in. When the Jets do the famous number “Cool” right before meeting with the Sharks for a rumble, they start off in Doc’s drug store. Then the store set-pieces disappear, allowing the Jets to take over the stage, which is now that piece of territory in the city that they are so intent on defending. We also witness this territory-marking through dance in “Dance at the Gym.”

The biggest flaw in the production is that it far too often stoops to gain the easy, low-comedy laugh. The result is that the action feels less weighty, the tragedy less serious–it leaves the audience not invested enough in the plight of the two lovers. When done right, “West Side Story” should have no trouble getting an audience to tear up. This is further aggravated by the clumsy scenes with dialogue that often feels awkward and inadequately rehearsed. These scenes disrupt the flow of the story. This alienates the audience from what is otherwise an emotionally involving journey. Thankfully the show always recovers its steam as soon as we hit the next dance number: the tempo, volume, and melody of the music work together to elicit a strong emotional response. It is by no means a perfect production, but what it does well makes up for its shortcomings.

A revised version of this article was published in the Stanford Daily here .

The best is yet to come: 2012 in Jazz

Between Stanford Jazz, Yoshi’s Jazz Clubs in San Francisco and Oakland, Zellerbach Hall and the San Francisco Jazz Festival, the Bay Area is a great place for jazz enthusiasts, and there’s much to look forward to in 2012. It’s one of the reasons why we can attract so many world-class artists who simply love playing the Bay Area.

Start the year off in San Francisco in the Fillmore jazz district at Yoshi’s, where you can catch trumpeter Roy Hargrove’s Quintet (Jan. 12–15), vibraphonist Bobby Hutcherson (Jan. 20–21) and the great bassist Stanley Clarke with his fusion band (Jan. 26–28). Keep your eyes peeled for more great concerts at Yoshi’s. Head to Berkeley on Jan. 29 to see the great young jazz pianist Alfredo Rodriguez do a solo concert in the Wheeler Auditorium.

Read the rest of this preview of Jazz in the Bay Area at the Stanford Daily.

Best Jazz Albums of 2012

Read the full article at the Stanford Daily.

Songs of Mirth and Melancholy”–Branford Marsalis and Joey Calderazzo

Jazz saxophonist Branford Marsalis and pianist Joey Calderazzo’s much-anticipated duo album of original music is absolutely marvelous, with a mix of foot-tapping numbers like “One Way” and beautiful ballads like “The Bard Lachrymose.” The result is a wonderful album that shows off what a jazz duo is meant to do.

 

33”–Alex Pangman

Canadian songstress Alex Pangman transports us back to the 1930s with her new album, “33”, full of songs almost exclusively from 1933 in celebration of her 33rd birthday. Pangman updates these old songs for a modern audience while still maintaining an authentic sound that’s true to the era. The albums includes songs like  “Happy As The Day Is Long,” “Shine” and “I Found A New Baby” that are so upbeat they’re sure to wake you up, get you smiling and get you on the dance floor. There are also several ballads to pull on your heartstrings like Pangman’s composition “As Lovely Lovers Do,” which sounds like it could have been written in the 1930s and “I Surrender Dear.”

Next to Normal: the must-see Broadway musical is in Toronto this week only

Where: Four Seasons Centre for the Performing Arts (at Osgoode Subway)
When: Tuesday-Saturday (26-30) at 7:30PM
Tickets: $35 if you’re under 30 and join <30 DanCap$40-65 regular admission.
More information: See the Next to Normal website

The best show in town this week, and possibly even this summer, is the 2009 Tony award-winning musical, Next to Normal, playing at the Four Seasons Centre, the last stop on its North American tour. Next to Normal tells the story of Diana Goodman (played by Alice Ripley in a Tony award-winning performance), a woman with bipolar disorder, and her family as they struggle to cope with the strains from her condition. Diana’s husband, Dan (Asa Somers), sticks with her, trying his best to help her cope with her condition, still clinging to the image of the woman he first met in his early twenties but that may no longer exist, deluding himself that everything is fine. Their daughter, Natalie (Emma Hunton), is a straight-A straight-edged student, who eventually hits breaking point, after starting up a sweet and optimistic romance with her supportive stoner classmate.Both Dan and Natalie are angry and hurt that they can’t just have a normal relationship with Diana and angered even more by the realisation that it is not Diana’s fault, so how can they lash out? The heartbreaking song “Who’s crazy” sums up the situation when Dan sings: “Who’s crazy? / The one who can’t cope / Or maybe the one who’ll still hope / The one who sees doctors or the one who just waits in the car / And I was a wild twenty five / And I loved a wife so alive / But now I believe I would settle for one who can drive.”

This is pretty heavy material. But it’s laced with a good deal of laugh-out-loud humour, never doing a disservice to the seriousness of the issues at hand. Take the hilarious number, “My psychopharmacologist and I”, for example. As the psychopharmacologist hilariously explains the complicated medication instructions “The round blue ones with food but not with the oblong white ones / The white ones with the round yellow ones but not the trapezoidal green ones…”, Diana sings about their relationship as an “odd romance / Intense and very intimate”: “He knows my deepest secrets / I know his… name!”. Continue reading

TO Jazz Festival: Review of the Dave Holland Quintet

The Dave Holland Quintet put on a phenomenal show at the Enwave Theatre at the Toronto Jazz Festival, a show so good that it is almost in the same league as those by the Keith Jarrett trio (which I called the best I’ve ever seen). Jazz concerts are at their best when you get to hear totally original music evolving, with the band in tune, giving you so much more than you can get from an album. The Dave Holland Quintet delivered, especially thanks to the fantastic bandleader Dave Holland on bass, the amazing musician’s musician Chris Potter on saxophone, and the wonderful Nate Smith on percussion, who reached impressive new heights as a percussionist in this show. The quintet also includes vibraphonist Steve Nelson and trombonist Robin Eubanks, who are certainly not slouches, being excellent musicians in their own right, but not quite in the same league as Holland, Potter, and Smith.

I love the way the Quintet puts together a show. They take their time to ease you into their style, starting off with some straightforward compositions with melody, improvisation on bass, improvisation on saxophone, improvisation on drums, melody, etc., just to get us used to the group and each musician’s style. These improvisations, it should be noted, by Potter, Smith, and Holland on the opening numbers “Walking a Walk” and “Cosmosis” are so fantastic that if these were all the concert had to offer, you could leave a very, very contented audience member.

And it gets better. As the concert progresses, so does the music, increasing in complexity. They let us in on what they’re doing though. We might get a complex piece in five parts, but each part gets added in sequentially. Robin Eubanks’s composition, “Pass it On”, was an exercise in perfecting the introduction and layering of five parts. We start with just  Eubanks on trombone and then after a few minutes, Nate Smith joins in on drums, playing off the existing rhythm in the piece. With those two playing, add in Potter on sax who continues to build on the two preceding parts. By the time the fifth part has been added in, which is Holland in this piece, it’s not just a fifth part, but a progression that builds on the other four, carefully piecing together a complex composition , and slowly enough that we know what they’re doing. Continue reading