• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Seventh Row

A place to think deeply about movies

  • Start here
  • eBooks
  • Podcasts
    • Seventh Row Podcast
    • 21st Folio
    • Seventh Row on other podcasts
  • Masterclasses
  • Merch
  • Join now!
Home / Essays / Review: Does Luce ask the right type of questions?

Brett Pardy / August 9, 2019

Review: Does Luce ask the right type of questions?

Brett Pardy reviews Luce, a provocative and ambiguous high school-set thriller about race and identity.

Octavio Spencer, Kelvin Harrison Jr., and Naomi Watts in Luce, directed by Julius Onah

Luce, directed by Julius Onah and adapted from the play by J.C. Lee, begins with an intriguing confrontation. Luce (Kelvin Harrison Jr), adopted by white parents from Eritrea as a seven-year-old, is a model student at a predominantly white suburban high school. However, his social studies teacher, Harriet (Octavia Spencer), calls in Luce’s adoptive mother Amy (Naomi Watts) to discuss her disturbance at Luce’s recent essay. Students were asked to take on the perspective of a historical figure and Luce selected decolonization philosopher Frantz Fanon. Fanon is one of the most influential critical theorists of the 20th century, but Harriet reductively characterizes him as someone who wanted to use violence against the people he disagreed with.

As an audience, we never get to hear any part of the actual essay, so it is unclear if this is Harriet’s or Luce’s interpretation of Fanon. This confrontation sets up what initially appears to be the film’s core question — are the liberal respectability politics, endorsed by both Harriet and Luce’s white parents, Luce’s best hope for the future? Or is Luce right in his contention that more radical politics (exemplified by Fanon) are necessary for him to exist beyond being a symbol of hard work and resilience for others. He states that he is tired of Harriet seeing him and his other minoritized classmates as “symbols that confirm her worldview.”

Unfortunately, Luce is not satisfied with its initial question about liberal respectability versus radical politics. It becomes more interested in sowing seeds of doubt about which characters we can trust. Harriet uses Luce’s essay as an excuse to search his locker for weapons, where she finds fireworks she claims could be used as explosives.

Harrison Jr’s standout performance shows us how Luce has learned to perform the role of model minority, even as we wonder in certain moments if he harbours a dark side. However, what makes Harrison Jr’s performance so good is also why the film fails. Luce begins by asking questions about race and social expectations that have no definitive answers, but that actually make the audience think. But the film quickly abandons that setup to instead ask questions about plot events that should have definitive answers. We’re made to question if Luce sexually assaulted his ex-girlfriend Stephanie (Andrea Bang), if Stephanie is lying about the sexual assault as part of Luce’s complicated plan to get Harriet fired, or even if this complicated plan doesn’t actually exist at all.

At one point, Luce laments, “I only get to be a saint or a monster”, but the film’s problem is that it is ultimately asking us to make this very judgement. The film’s plot only gives us two options: either Luce has sociopathically manipulated everyone around him to get a teacher he does not like fired, or Harriet has smeared the image of a student she does not like because he doesn’t fit her respectability politics. While the film does not quite tell us the answer, either choice feels overly contrived, and both are a distraction from the initial question about how a black exceptional student navigates America’s liberal enclaves.

Tweet
Share31
Share
31 Shares

Filed Under: Essays, Film Reviews, Social Justice Tagged With: Coming-of-age, Cross-Cultural, Identities

Get personalized film recommendations

Discover your new favourite film.

Privacy and Cookies Policy

100% free. Unsubscribe any time.

« Older Post
Ep. 16: Midsommar and Florence Pugh
Newer Post »
‘Connection to landscapes’: William McGregor on folk horror and Gwen

Footer






Seventh Row

  • Log In
  • Film Adventurer Membership
  • Cinephile Membership
  • Merchandise
  • Institutional Subscriptions
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • About
  • Contact Us

Our Ebooks

  • In their own words: Fiction directors – an ebook on filmmaking
  • Roads to nowhere: Kelly Reichardt’s broken American dreams – an ebook to prepare you for First Cow
  • Portraits of Resistance: The Cinema of Céline Sciamma
  • Beyond Empowertainment: Feminist Horror and The Struggle for Female Agency
  • The 2019 Canadian Cinema Yearbook
  • Tour of Memories: on Joanna Hogg’s The Souvenir
  • Peterloo in Process: A Mike Leigh collaboration
  • Leave No Trace
  • Lean on Pete
  • You Were Never Really Here
  • Call Me by Your Name

Browse

  • Start here
  • Directors We Love
  • Films We Love
  • Guide to Canadian film
  • World Cinema for Young Adults
  • Family Viewing Guide
  • Interview Index by Job Title
  • Interview Index by Last Name

Discover Great Films: Take a Challenge

  • Kelly Reichardt Challenge
  • Céline Sciamma challenge
  • Joanna Hogg Challenge
  • Canadian Cinema Challenge





Get personalized film recommendations

Discover your new favourite film.

Privacy and Cookies Policy

100% free. Unsubscribe any time.

Connect with us

  • Lockdown Film School
  • Events
  • Podcast
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

Follow us on social media

Facebook

Like

Instagram

Follow

Twitter

Follow

© 2021 · Seventh Row &middot

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • FAQ
  • Contribute
  • Contact